Active Policy Notifications
Clinical Relationship Logic
Select Cardiology Guidelines
Lab Management Guidelines
News & Announcements
Notification Issue Date:
to Policy #
BCR-ABL Testing for Monitoring of Individuals with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, who are Receiving Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®) Therapy
Pharmacogenetic Testing to Determine Drug Sensitivity (AmeriHealth Administrators)
Title: BCR-ABL Testing for Monitoring of Individuals with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, who are Receiving Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec
BCR-ABL1 variants are the focus of study investigating their dynamics and relationship to chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) disease phenotype, progression, development of imatinib resistance, and response to targeted therapy with second-generation (SG) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The current body of peer-reviewed research exploring these relationships consists of animal studies, basic research studies, review articles, and cohort studies, including phase I/II/III clinical trials. The focus of this analysis is on the relationship between BCR-ABL1 variants and imatinib resistance, as well as response to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor
(TKI) (SGI) therapy in individuals with CML.
None of the retrieved studies thoroughly evaluated commercially available testing methods for BCR-ABL1 variants. An early study by Branford and colleagues reported that direct sequencing was capable of detecting variants at 20% dilution ratio (Branford et al., 2003). While other experimental methodologies may detect variants when they are present at lower frequencies in affected cells, the clinical significance of low concentrations of BCR-ABL1 variant cells is not clear, and many researchers consider sequencing to be adequately sensitive (Branford et al., 2003; Hughes et al., 2006; Soverini et al., 2006; Jones et al., 2009; Ernst et al., 2011; Alikian et al., 2012). The same early study by Branford and colleagues provided information pertinent to the clinical validity of BCR-ABL1 testing, reporting that the presence of BCR-ABL1 variants was strongly associated with the development of imatinib resistance in a cohort of CML patients receiving imatinib therapy. This association was stronger in patients with more advanced disease (Branford et al., 2003). Studies describing the overall frequency of BCR-ABL1 variants in CML patients who had developed imatinib resistance had variable inclusion criteria and definitions of imatinib resistance. The most common methodologies used to test for BCR-ABL1 variants were PCR and direct sequencing. The reported frequencies across imatinib-resistant patient populations were 23.3% to 56.4% (Soverini et al., 2006; Hochhaus et al., 2007; Kantarjian et al., 2007; Jabbour et al., 2008a; Ernst et al., 2008c; Apperley et al., 2009; Jabbour et al., 2009; Schnittger et al., 2010; Bengió et al., 2011; Quintás-Cardama et al., 2011). In studies that described BCR-ABL1 variant frequencies according to CML phase, variants were generally more common in advanced disease phases (Soverini et al., 2006; Hochhaus et al., 2007; Kantarjian et al., 2007; Apperley et al., 2009; Bengió et al., 2011; Quintás-Cardama et al., 2011), although one study did report a comparatively reduced frequency in BC-CML patients (Quintás-Cardama et al., 2011). Compound variants were reported in 6.3% to 16.5% of patients with variants. Frequency of the BCR-ABL1 p.Thr315Ile variant ranged from 4.1% to 26.3% (Soverini et al., 2006; Hochhaus et al., 2007; Kantarjian et al., 2007; Jabbour et al., 2008a; Apperley et al., 2009; Jabbour et al., 2009; Schnittger et al., 2010; Bengió et al., 2011; Quintás-Cardama et al., 2011). All studies that investigated response to TKI therapy reported a lack of response to SGI therapy in p.Thr315Ile carriers (Hochhaus et al., 2007; Kantarjian et al., 2007; Jabbour et al., 2008a; Apperley et al., 2009; Jabbour et al., 2009).
The body of literature regarding BCR-ABL1 variants in CML suggests that the issues surrounding the use of BCR-ABL1 variant testing for guidance in clinical decision making following imatinib resistance are complex and multifaceted. The published evidence supports the use of testing for the p.Thr315Ile variant, as patients with p.Thr315Ile do not respond to imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib, and should be offered allogeneic stem cell transplantation, omacetaxine, or experimental treatments (Gibbons et al., 2012). Regarding other BCR-ABL1 variants, the evidence suggests that certain common variants confer less sensitivity to SGI. These include p.Phe317Leu and p.Val299Leu, which are less sensitive to dasatinib; and p.Tyr253His, p.Glu255Lys/p.Glu255Val, and p.Phe359Val/p.Phe359Cys, which are less sensitive to nilotinib (Hughes et al., 2009; Jabbour et al., 2009; Müller et al., 2009). There have been > 100 reported BCR-ABL1 variants to date; however, the clinical significance of most of these is unknown, complicating the interpretation of results of BCR-ABL1 variant testing (Jones et al., 2009). Larger studies investigating the clinical response to SGI after imatinib resistance with respect to BCR-ABL1 variant status are needed to definitively ascertain the effects certain variants have on treatment outcomes. It is important that these studies share consistent inclusion criteria, definitions of imatinib resistance, and testing methodologies, in order to robustly compare results (Jones et al., 2009). In addition to single BCR-ABL1 variants, compound variants frequently occur in imatinib-resistant patients, and their clinical significance is not entirely clear; their presence may indicate progressing disease and it is not clear how differing SGI sensitivities of co-occurring variants interact (Branford et al., 2009; Jones et al., 2009; Jabbour et al., 2011; Ernst and Hochhaus, 2012; Soverini et al., 2012).
In reviewing the studies included in this assessment, a number of limitations are noted. Inclusion criteria such as CML stage and prior treatment varied between studies, as did patient response criteria and definitions of imatinib resistance, intolerance, and/or failure. BCR-ABL1 variant detection methods also varied between studies, although PCR amplification followed by direct sequencing was the most common testing methodology. In addition, criteria used to define the sensitivity of BCR-ABL1 variants to TKIs vary from study to study; this considerably limits the current use of BCR-ABL1 variant status other than p.Thr315Ile in informing therapy following imatinib resistance.
Coverage is subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations of the member's contract
BCR-ABL testing for monitoring of individuals with chronic myelogenous leukemia or acute myelogenous leukemia, who are receiving imatinib mesylate (Gleevec®) therapy, is considered medically necessary and, therefore, covered.
The individual's medical record must reflect the medical necessity for the care provided. These medical records may include, but are not limited to: records from the professional provider's office, hospital, nursing home, home health agencies, therapies, and test reports.
The Company may conduct reviews and audits of services to our members, regardless of the participation status of the provider. All documentation is to be available to the Company upon request. Failure to produce the requested information may result in a denial for the service.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable benefit contract, BCR-ABL Testing for Monitoring of Individuals with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, who are Receiving Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®) Therapy is covered under the medical benefits of the Company’s products when the medical necessity criteria listed in this medical policy are met.
Alikian M, Gerrard G, Subramanian PG, et al. BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations: methodology and clinical evaluation. Am J Hematol. 2012;87(3):298-304.
Apperley JF, Cortes JE, Kim DW, et al. Dasatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase after imatinib failure: the START a trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(21):3472-3479.
Bengió RM, Riva ME, Moiraghi B, et al. Clinical outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia imatinib-resistant patients: do BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations affect patient survival? First multicenter Argentinean study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2011;52(9):1720-1726.
Branford S, Hughes T. Detection of BCR-ABL mutations and resistance to imatinib mesylate. Methods Mol Med. 2006;125:93-106.
Branford S, Melo JV, Hughes TP. Selecting optimal second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia patients after imatinib failure: does the BCR-ABL mutation status really matter? Blood. 2009;114(27):5426-5435.
Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S, et al. Detection of BCR-ABL mutations in patients with CML treated with imatinib is virtually always accompanied by clinical resistance, and mutations in the ATP phosphate-binding loop (P-loop) are associated with a poor prognosis. Blood. 2003;102(1):276-283.
Chien JH, Tang JL, Chen RL, Li CC, Lee CP. Detection of BCR-ABL gene mutations in Philadelphia chromosome positive leukemia patients resistant to STI-571 cancer therapy. Leuk Res. 2008;32(11):1724-1734.
Cornelison AM, Kantarjian H, Cortes J, Jabbour E. Outcome of treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors after imatinib failure. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2011;(11 Suppl 1):S101-S110.
Cortes J, Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, et al. Dynamics of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia after sequential treatment with multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2007a;110(12):4005-4011.
Cortes J, Rousselot P, Kim DW, et al. Dasatinib induces complete hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis. Blood. 2007b;109(8):3207-3213.
Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(23):2408-2417.
Ernst T, Erben P, Müller MC, et al. Dynamics of BCR-ABL mutated clones prior to hematologic or cytogenetic resistance to imatinib. Haematologica. 2008b;93(2):186-192.
Ernst T, Hochhaus A. Chronic myeloid leukemia: clinical impact of BCR-ABL1 mutations and other lesions associated with disease progression. Semin Oncol. 2012;39(1):58-66.
Ernst T, Hoffmann J, Erben P, et al. ABL single nucleotide polymorphisms may masquerade as BCR-ABL mutations associated with resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2008c;93(9):1389-1393.
Ernst T, Hoffmann J, Erben P, Hehlmann R, Hochhaus A, Müller MC. Suitability of the PAXgene system to stabilize bone marrow RNA in imatinib-resistant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008a;46(3):318-322.
Ernst T, La Rosée P, Müller MC, Hochhaus A. BCR-ABL mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2011;25(5):997-1008, v-vi.
Gibbons DL, Pricl S, Kantarjian H, Cortes J, Quintás-Cardama A. The rise and fall of gatekeeper mutations? The BCR-ABL1 T315I paradigm. Cancer. 2012;118(2):293-299.
Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K, et al. Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science. 2001;293(5531):876-880.
Gudgeon JM, McClain MR, Palomaki GE, Williams MS. Rapid ACCE: experience with a rapid and structured approach for evaluating gene-based testing. Genet Med. 2007;9(7):473-478.
Guilhot F, Apperley J, Kim DW, et al. Dasatinib induces significant hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase. Blood. 2007;109(10):4143-4150.
Hayes Inc. Hayes GTE Report. BCR-ABL Testing in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML). Lansdale, PA: Hayes, Inc.; September 30, 2008.
Hess G, Meyer RG, Schuch B, Bechthold K, El-Kholy I, Huber C. Sustained remissions and low rate of BCR-ABL resistance mutations with imatinib treatment chronic myelogenous leukemia in patients treated in late chronic phase: a 5-year follow up. Am J Hematol. 2008;83(3):178-184.
Hochhaus A, Kantarjian HM, Baccarani M, et al. Dasatinib induces notable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of imatinib therapy. Blood. 2007;109(6):2303-2309.
Hochhaus A, Kreil S, Corbin AS, et al. Molecular and chromosomal mechanisms of resistance to imatinib (STI571) therapy. Leukemia. 2002;16(11):2190-2196.
Horvat I, Antolic MR, Zadro R, Sertic D, Labar B. Clinical significance of T315I ABL kinase domain mutation detection in patients resistant to imatinib mesylate therapy. Biochemia Medica. 2010;75-81.
Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood. 2006;108(1):28-37.
Hughes T, Saglio G, Branford S, et al. Impact of baseline BCR-ABL mutations on response to nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4204-4210.
Jabbour E, Branford S, Saglio G, Jones D, Cortes JE, Kantarjian HM. Practical advice for determining the role of BCR-ABL mutations in guiding tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2011;117(9):1800-1811.
Jabbour E, Jones D, Kantarjian HM, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors after imatinib failure is predicted by sensitivity of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. Blood. 2009;114(10):2037-2043.
Jabbour E, Kantarjian HM, Jones D, et al. Characteristics and outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia patients with F317L BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation after therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2008a;112(13):4839-4842.
Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Jones D, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and T315I mutation following failure of imatinib mesylate therapy. Blood. 2008b;112(1):53-55.
Jones D, Kamel-Reid S, Bahler D, et al. Laboratory practice guidelines for detecting and reporting BCR-ABL drug resistance mutations in chronic myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2009;11(1):4-11.
Jones D, Thomas D, Yin CC, et al. Kinase domain point mutations in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia emerge after therapy with BCR-ABL kinase inhibitors. Cancer. 2008;113(5):985-994.
Kancha RK, von Bubnoff N, Miething C, Peschel C, Götze KS, Duyster J. Imatinib and leptomycin B are effective in overcoming imatinib-resistance due to Bcr-Abl amplification and clonal evolution but not due to Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutation. Haematologica. 2008;93(11):1718-1722.
Kang HY, Hwang JY, Kim SH, Goh H, Kim M, Kim DW. Comparison of allele specific oligonucleotide-polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing for high throughput screening of ABL kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia resistant to imatinib. Haematologica. 2006;91(5):659-662.
Kantarjian HM, Giles F, Gattermann N, et al. Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase following imatinib resistance and intolerance. Blood. 2007;110(10):3540-3546.
Khalil SH, Abu-Amero KK, Al Mohareb F, Chaudhri NA. Molecular monitoring of response to imatinib (Glivec) in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: experience at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010;14(1):67-74.
Khorashad JS, Milojkovic D, Mehta P, et al. In vivo kinetics of kinase domain mutations in CML patients treated with dasatinib after failing imatinib. Blood. 2008;111(4):2378-2381.
Khoury HJ, Cortes JE, Kantarjian HM, et al. Bosutinib is active in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib and dasatinib and/or nilotinib therapy failure. Blood. 2012;119(15):3403-3412.
Kim SH, Kim D, Kim DW, et al. Analysis of Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations in Korean chronic myeloid leukaemia patients: poor clinical outcome of P-loop and T315I mutation is disease phase dependent. Hematol Oncol. 2009;27(4):190-197.
Kim WS, Kim D, Kim DW, et al. Dynamic change of T315I BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation in Korean chronic myeloid leukaemia patients during treatment with Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Hematol Oncol. 2010b;28(2):82-88.
Kim TD, Türkmen S, Schwarz M, et al. Impact of additional chromosomal aberrations and BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations on the response to nilotinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2010a;95(4):582-588.
Kwan TK, Ma ES, Chan YY, et al. BCR-ABL mutational studies for predicting the response of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors after imatinib failure. Hong Kong Med J. 2009;15(5):365-373.
le Coutre P, Ottmann OG, Giles F, et al. Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant accelerated-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2008;111(4):1834-1839.
Lewandowski K, Warzocha K, Hellmann A, et al. Frequency of BCR-ABL gene mutations in Polish patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib: a final report of the MAPTEST study. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2009;119(12):789-794.
Manrique Arechavaleta G, Scholl V, Pérez V, et al. Rapid and sensitive allele-specific (AS)-RT-PCR assay for detection of T315I mutation in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Clin Exp Med. 2011;11(1):55-59.
Markose P, Chendamarai E, Balasubramanian P, et al. Spectrum of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia from India with suspected resistance to imatinib-mutations are rare and have different distributions. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(12):2092-2095.
Mascarenhas CC, Cunha AF, Miranda EC, et al. New mutations detected by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography during screening of exon 6 bcr-abl mutations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(7):1148-1154.
Müller MC, Cortes JE, Kim DW, et al. Dasatinib treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: analysis of responses according to preexisting BCR-ABL mutations. Blood. 2009;114(24):4944-4953.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Version 2.2013). 2012. Available at:
. Accessed November 19, 2012.
Nicolini FE, Hayette S, Corm S, et al. Clinical outcome of 27 imatinib mesylate-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia patients harboring a T315I BCR-ABL mutation. Haematologica. 2007;92(9):1238-1241.
Ohanian M, Cortes J, Kantarjian H, Jabbour E. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in acute and chronic leukemias. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012;13(7):927-938.
Ono T, Miyawaki S, Kimura F, et al. BCR-ABL1 mutations in patients with imatinib-resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia by use of the PCR-Invader assay. Leuk Res. 2011;35(5):598-603.
Parker WT, Ho M, Scott HS, Hughes TP, Branford S. Poor response to second-line kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with multiple low-level mutations, irrespective of their resistance profile. Blood. 2012;119(10):2234-2238.
Pfeifer H, Wassmann B, Pavlova A, et al. Kinase domain mutations of BCR-ABL frequently precede imatinib-based therapy and give rise to relapse in patients with de novo Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Blood. 2007;110(2):727-734.
Poláková KM, Lopotová T, Klamová H, Moravcová J. High-resolution melt curve analysis: initial screening for mutations in BCR-ABL kinase domain. Leuk Res. 2008;32(8):1236-1243.
Preuner S, Mitterbauer G, Mannhalter C, et al. Quantitative monitoring of BCR/ABL1 mutants for surveillance of subclone-evolution, -expansion, and -depletion in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(2):233-236.
Qin Y, Chen S, Jiang B, et al. Characteristics of BCR-ABL kinase domain point mutations in Chinese imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Ann Hematol. 2011;90(1):47-52.
Quintás-Cardama A, Kantarjian H, O’Brien S, et al. Outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with multiple ABL1 kinase domain mutations receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Haematologica. 2011;96(6):918-921.
Rajappa S, Mallavarapu KM, Gundeti S, Roshnipaul T, Jacob RT, Digumarti R. Kinase domain mutations and responses to dose escalation in chronic myeloid leukemia resistant to standard dose imatinib mesylate. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51(1):79-84.
Roche-Lestienne C, Soenen-Cornu V, Grardel-Duflos N, et al. Several types of mutations of the Abl gene can be found in chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant to STI571, and they can pre-exist to the onset of treatment. Blood. 2002;100(3):1014-1018.
Schnittger S, Bacher U, Dicker F, et al. Associations between imatinib resistance conferring mutations and Philadelphia positive clonal cytogenetic evolution in CML. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2010;49(10):910-918.
Shah NP, Skaggs BJ, Branford S, et al. Sequential ABL kinase inhibitor therapy selects for compound drug-resistant BCR-ABL mutations with altered oncogenic potency. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(9):2562-2569.
Sherbenou DW, Hantschel O, Kaupe I, et al. BCR-ABL SH3-SH2 domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients on imatinib. Blood. 2010;116(17):3278-3285.
Sherbenou DW, Wong MJ, Humayun A, et al. Mutations of the BCR-ABL-kinase domain occur in a minority of patients with stable complete cytogenetic response to imatinib. Leukemia. 2007;21(3):489-493.
Soverini S, Colarossi S, Gnani A, et al.; GIMEMA Working Party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Contribution of ABL kinase domain mutations to imatinib resistance in different subsets of Philadelphia-positive patients: by the GIMEMA Working Party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(24):7374-7379.
Soverini S, Colarossi S, Gnani A, et al. Resistance to dasatinib in Philadelphia-positive leukemia patients and the presence or the selection of mutations at residues 315 and 317 in the BCR-ABL kinase domain. Haematologica. 2007;92(3):401-404.
Soverini S, Gnani A, Colarossi S, et al. Philadelphia-positive patients who already harbor imatinib-resistant Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations have a higher likelihood of developing additional mutations associated with resistance to second- or third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood. 2009;114(10):2168-2171.
Soverini S, Hochhaus A, Nicolini FE, et al. BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2011;118(5):1208-1215.
Soverini S, Martinelli G, Amabile M, et al.; Italian Cooerative [sic] Study Group on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia; European LeukemiaNet-6th Framework Program of the European Community. Denaturing-HPLC-based assay for detection of ABL mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant to Imatinib. Clin Chem. 2004;50(7):1205-1213.
Soverini S, Martinelli G, Rosti G, et al. ABL mutations in late chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients with up-front cytogenetic resistance to imatinib are associated with a greater likelihood of progression to blast crisis and shorter survival: a study by the GIMEMA Working Party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(18):4100-4109.
Soverini S, Martinelli G, Rosti G, Iacobucci I, Baccarani M. Advances in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the evolving role of Bcr-Abl mutations and mutational analysis. Pharmacogenomics. 2012;13(11):1271-1284.
Inclusion of a code in this table does not imply reimbursement. Eligibility, benefits, limitations, exclusions, precertification/referral requirements, provider contracts, and Company policies apply.
The codes listed below are updated on a regular basis, in accordance with nationally accepted coding guidelines. Therefore, this policy applies to any and all future applicable coding changes, revisions, or updates.
In order to ensure optimal reimbursement, all health care services, devices, and pharmaceuticals should be reported using the billing codes and modifiers that most accurately represent the services rendered, unless otherwise directed by the Company.
Code Number and Narrative
HCPCS Level II
G0452 Molecular pathology procedure; physician interpretation and report
Version Effective Date:
Version Issued Date:
Version Reissued Date:
© 2017 AmeriHealth.