Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of plasma cells. Healthy plasma cells grow and divide to make new cells; once cells grow old or get damaged, they die. Because of the genetic variations in MM, the myeloma cells replicate uncontrollably throughout the bone marrow, do not die when they get old or damaged, outnumber normal blood cells in the bone marrow, and destroy the bone tissue. The antibodies synthesized by myeloma cells do not fight infections in the same way as normal antibodies do. MM symptoms are low blood counts that cause anemia, bone pain, kidney damage due to elevated creatinine or serum protein, infection, fatigue, and hypercalcemia.
Nearly all individuals with myeloma who receive standard therapies have relapse. Those with triple-class–refractory MM (i.e., disease that is refractory to a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 antibody) or relapsed MM who receive standard treatment have a poor prognosis. Therefore, there is a high demand for agents that treat MM in individuals who do not respond or who progress after first- or subsequent-line therapy.
Elranatamab-bcmm (Elrexfio)is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) that binds on T cells and to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CD3 expressed on the surface of MM cells and some healthy B-lineage cells.
PEER-REVIEW LITERATURE
SUMMARY
The safety and efficacy was evaluated in a phase II, MagnetisMM-3 trial, patients with relapsed/refractory MM received subcutaneous elranatamab once weekly. The primary population in whom the efficacy was seen were patients (n=123) without prior BCMA-directed therapy. The findings indicated an objective response rate (ORR) of 61.0% (75/123) and 35.0% greater than or equal to complete response (CR). Fifty responders switched to biweekly dosing, and 40 of those (80.0%) improved or maintained their response for 6 months or more. Common adverse events reported were infections, cytokine release syndrome, anemia, and neutropenia. With biweekly dosing, grade 3–4 adverse events decreased from 58.6% to 46.6%.
OFF-LABEL INDICATIONS
There may be additional indications contained in the Policy section of this document due to the evaluation of criteria highlighted in the Company's off-label policy, and/or review of clinical guidelines issues by leading professional organizations and government entities.