It looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again.
Advanced Search
Toggle navigation
Commercial
Home
Commercial Policies
Currently selected
Medicare Advantage Policies
Contact Us
Commercial
Medical Policy
Policy Bulletins
Currently selected
Active Policy Notifications
Policy Types and Descriptions
Services Requiring Precertification
New Jersey
Pennsylvania
Coverage Guidelines
Select Cardiology Guidelines
Diagnostic Radiology Guidelines
Lab Management Guidelines
Musculoskeletal Guidelines
Radiation Therapy Guidelines
Sleep Disorder Management Guidelines
News & Announcements
Site Activity
Contact Us
Published
Notification
Uterine Artery Embolization
Notification Issued Date:
MPNotificationDescriptionPub
Title:
Uterine Artery Embolization
Policy #:
11.06.04k
MPNewsFLASHPub
Policy
MPPolicyPub
The Company reserves the right to reimburse only those services that are furnished in the most appropriate and cost-effective setting that is appropriate to the member’s medical needs and condition.
MEDICALLY NECESSARY
Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is considered medically necessary and, therefore, covered as a treatment for individuals with uterine fibroids when
EITHER
of the following criteria is met:
The individual is experiencing symptoms, such as but not limited to:
Menorrhagia (excessive menstrual bleeding) as a direct result of the fibroid (i.e., not resulting from hyperplasia, atypia, or cancer) that interferes with daily activities or causes anemia
Pelvic pain or pressure as a direct result of the fibroid
Lower back pain as a direct result of the fibroid
Urinary symptoms related to compression of the bladder (e.g., urinary frequency, urgency)
Gastrointestinal symptoms related to compression of the bowel (e.g., constipation, bloating) as a direct result of the fibroid
Dyspareunia (painful or difficult sexual relations) as a direct result of the fibroid
The individual is asymptomatic with an abdominally palpable fibroid or significantly enlarged fibroid on abdominal/vaginal examination
UAE is considered medically necessary and, therefore, covered as a treatment for postpartum uterine hemorrhage.
Repeat UAE may be considered medically necessary and, therefore, covered to treat symptoms of uterine fibroids that persist after an initial UAE.
ABSOLUTE CONTRAINDICATIONS
UAE is considered not medically necessary and, therefore, not covered for individuals with
ANY
of the following absolute contraindications:
Cancers of the endometrium, cervix, or ovaries
Pregnancy
Active infection
EXPERIMENTAL/INVESTIGATIONAL
UAE is considered experimental/investigational and, therefore, not covered for
ANY
of the following because the safety and/or effectiveness of UAE for these individuals has not been established by a review of the available published peer-reviewed literature:
Treatment of an individual who may want to become pregnant. Please refer to the Guidelines section of this policy for further clarification.
Management of cervical ectopic pregnancy
Treatment of adenomyosis
REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION
The individual's medical record must reflect the medical necessity for the care provided. These medical records may include, but are not limited to: records from the professional provider's office, hospital, nursing home, home health agencies, therapies, and test reports.
The Company may conduct reviews and audits of services to our members, regardless of the participation status of the provider. All documentation is to be available to the Company upon request. Failure to produce the requested information may result in a denial for the service.
Guidelines
MPGuidelinesPub
Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is appropriate as a treatment for individuals with symptomatic uterine fibroids who meet any of the following criteria:
The use of anesthesia places the individual at high surgical risk.
The individual has medical contraindications to hysterectomy (e.g., morbid obesity).
The use of hormonal therapy is contraindicated, or the individual is intolerant to or has previously failed a course of hormone therapy.
The individual wishes to avoid hysterectomy.
The individual has hydronephrosis.
Individuals who have received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to shrink uterine fibroids should not receive treatment with UAE until 6 weeks post-GnRH agonist treatment. UAE performed earlier than 6 weeks after hormone therapy may not be effective.
BENEFIT APPLICATION
Subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable benefit contract, UAE for the treatment of uterine fibroids is covered under the medical benefits of the Company’s products when the medical necessity criteria listed in the medical policy are met. However, services that are identified in this policy as experimental/investigational are not eligible for coverage or reimbursement by the Company. Services that are experimental/investigational are a benefit contract exclusion for all products of the Company. Therefore, they are not eligible for reimbursement consideration.
When UAE is performed on an individual who has any of the absolute contraindications listed in this policy, it is considered not medically necessary and, therefore, not covered.
DESIRED FERTILITY
UAE may be appropriate as a treatment for individuals who want to become pregnant or who desire fertility because these individuals may not be candidates for other treatment options such as hormonal therapy, myomectomy, or hysterectomy. However, studies have shown that individuals who are treated with UAE are at increased risk for complications and miscarriages in subsequent pregnancies. Diminished ovarian reserve and increased risk for complications such as postdelivery bleeding have been noted.
US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA) STATUS
There are numerous devices approved by the FDA for UAE.
Description
MPDescriptionPub
Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas) are extremely common benign tumors that are located within the uterine cavity (submucosal fibroids), on the serosal surface of the uterus (subserosal), within the body of the uterine musculature (intramural fibroids), and on a stalk inside or outside the uterus (pedunculated).
Uterine fibroids may be asymptomatic but can cause menorrhagia (excessive menstrual bleeding), pelvic pain, dyspareunia (painful or difficult sexual relations), lower back pain, constipation, urinary frequency, or infertility. Although hysterectomy is considered the definitive treatment of uterine fibroids, it may not be a viable option for individuals who wish to maintain fertility or are at high risk for surgery.
Transcatheter uterine artery embolization (UAE), also known as uterine fibroid embolization (UFE), is a minimally invasive, uterine-sparing treatment option for individuals with uterine fibroids. UAE has several advantages over conventional hormonal suppression and surgical procedures, including avoiding the side effects of drug therapy and the trauma of surgery; lower rate of morbidity; and shorter recovery time. Along with hysteroscopic resection, myolysis, and laparoscopic myomectomy, UAE widens the treatment options for individuals requiring treatment without hysterectomy.
During UAE, the uterine fibroid tumor is selectively devascularized by an injection of embolic agents (e.g., Embosphere® Microspheres) into the vessels that provide the blood supply to the tumor. While the individual is under sedation, a catheter is guided, under fluoroscopy, from the femoral artery (accessed through a percutaneous puncture site in the groin) to the uterine artery that supplies blood to the fibroid. When the catheter reaches the uterine artery, the embolic material is slowly released into the artery. The particles flow to the fibroids, wedge into the vessel, and block the blood flow, causing the fibroids to shrink while sparing surrounding uterine structures. As the fibroids shrink, the
preprocedure
symptoms are relieved or reduced.
In most cases, UAE is performed bilaterally and requires overnight hospitalization. During or following the procedure, angiography is performed to assess the effectiveness of the procedure. A radiopaque contrast medium is injected through the catheter used during the procedure, and fluoroscopic images of the vessel are recorded. The images are interpreted to evaluate the status of the blood vessel and the effectiveness of the treatment.
UAE is also used as a treatment of postpartum hemorrhage. Per the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin #183 (2017), candidates for UAE typically are hemodynamically stable, appear to have persistent slow bleeding, and less-invasive therapy has failed (e.g., uterotonic agents, uterine massage, uterine compression, and manual removal of any clots).
The ACOG issued a Practice Bulletin on Alternatives to Hysterectomy in the Management of Leiomyomas in 2008 (Reaffirmed in 2016). The concerns identified for individuals intending to become pregnant after UAE include age-related impairment of ovarian function and placentation problems caused by a potential compromise of the blood supply to the ovary and endometrium, which can lead to diminished ovarian reserve and abnormal placentation, respectively, even in individuals who are otherwise not at risk for these problems. Therefore, UAE in an individual wishing to become pregnant
postprocedure
should be approached with caution; these potential risks must be fully disclosed.
The effect of UAE on pregnancy remains understudied. Although systematic reviews of fertility and pregnancy outcomes after UAE suggest that successful pregnancy is possible, there are higher rates of miscarriage and postpartum hemorrhage compared to individuals with intramural fibroids treated with myomectomy. There are limited data on pregnancy outcomes in individuals who became pregnant following UAE for treatment of postpartum hemorrhage.
A retrospective study published by
Pisco
et al. (2017) examining pregnancy rates post-UAE in 359 individuals (mean age, 35.9 years) with uterine fibroids and/or
adenomyosis
reported spontaneous pregnancy rates of 29.5 percent and 40.1 percent, at 1 and 2 years post-UAE, respectively. Conventional UAE, involving bilateral artery embolization, was performed in the majority of patients, while 160 received partial UAE, which treated only the small arteries feeding the fibroids. This was done to preserve fertility, with the idea that inducing a lower degree of ischemia to the endometrium may aid in ease of conception. Using Kaplan-Meier estimation, this research group found the overall probability of successful pregnancy with live birth 1 year following surgery was 24.4 percent, and after 2 years was 36.7 percent. Cox proportional hazards modeling showed there to be no significant difference in spontaneous pregnancy 1 year after partial or conventional UAE (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.92–1.75;
P
=0.14), and no difference between groups for successful pregnancy ending in live birth (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95 percent CI, 0.87–1.80;
P
=0.21). Notably, adverse events were not worse in the partial UAE group relative to the conventional group: 14.6 percent vs. 23.1 percent;
P
=0.04. These data suggest that UAE may show itself to be a safe and effective approach towards fibroids in individuals who desire to retain their fertility.
Few studies have been reported that focus specifically on repeat UAE in individuals whose symptoms have either responded incompletely or recurred after the initial UAE. Although there is a lack of controlled studies on repeat UAE, several case series have reported a high success rate after a second UAE for recurrent or persistent symptoms.
There are other indications that may potentially be aided by use of UAE, including
adenomyosis
.
Adenomyosis
, also called uterine endometriosis, occurs when the lining of the uterus (endometrium) grows into the muscular wall of the uterus. The displaced tissue thickens, breaks down, and bleeds during each menstrual cycle. This condition is associated with cramps, heavy bleeding, and discomfort that impacts quality of life.
Several studies conducted on the efficacy of UAE in symptomatic
adenomyosis
have shown sustained clinical and symptomatic improvements. A 2011 systematic review by
Popovic
et al. of 15 studies including 511 individuals with
adenomyosis
found statistically significant clinical improvement in 75 percent of subjects at short- and long-term follow-up. In 2016, a retrospective observational study examining treatment of
adenomyosis
with UAE reported improvement in dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia in patients with vascular lesions (n=252; Zhou et al.). Other studies (Kitamura et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2007; de
Bruijn
et al., 2017) also reported positive outcomes in the use of UAE for this indication. However, none of these studies were controlled or randomized. As such, the efficacy of UAE in
adenomyosis
remains unclear, due to a lack of high-quality data. Larger scale, randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up times are mandatory to determine the efficacy of UAE in the treatment of
adenomyosis
.
Additionally, the current available ACOG Committee Opinion regarding
adenomyosis
and other causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (“Management of Acute Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in
Nonpregnant
Reproductive Aged Women”, Committee Opinion 557) allows physicians to use discretion in the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding, depending on clinical circumstances and patient desire for future fertility. Although the organization does not specifically rule out the use of UAE for
adenomyosis
, it is also not explicitly recommended.
Available studies have demonstrated improved conditions after treatment for some individuals; however, there is overall insufficient evidence to support its use. In consideration of available evidence and professional society guidelines, use of UAE cannot be established as medically necessary for this indication.
In addition to
adenomyosis
, UAE has been proposed for management of cervical ectopic pregnancy and uterine arteriovenous malformations; however, there are no controlled studies evaluating UAE for management of cervical ectopic pregnancy or uterine arteriovenous malformations.
References
MPReferencesPub
Al-
Mahrizi
S,
Tulandi
T. Treatment of uterine fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: myomectomy and uterine artery embolization.
Best
Pract
Res
Clin
Obstet
Gynaecol
. 2007;21(6):995-1005.
Ambat
S, Mittal S, Srivastava DN, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic occlusion of uterine vessels for management of symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Int
J
Gynecol
Obstet
. 2009;105(2):162-165.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). ACOG Practice Bulletin 96: Alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of
leiomyomas
.
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2008;112(2 Part 1):387-400.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). ACOG Practice Bulletin 183: Postpartum hemorrhage.
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2017;130(4):e168-e186. (Reaffirmed 2019).
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). ACOG Practice Bulletin 228: Management of symptomatic uterine
leiomyomas
.
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2021;137(6):e100-e115.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 557: Management of acute abnormal uterine bleeding in
nonpregnant
reproductive-aged women.
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2013;121(4):891-896. (Reaffirmed 2020, 2024).
Bae SH, Kim MD, Kim GM, et al. Uterine artery embolization for
adenomyosis
: percentage of necrosis predicts midterm clinical recurrence.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2015;26(9):1290-1296.e2.
Barnard EP,
AbdElmagied
AM, Vaughan LE, et al.
Periprocedural
outcomes comparing fibroid embolization and focused ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial and comprehensive cohort analysis.
Am J
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2017;216(5):500.e1-500.e11.
Barral
PA, Saeed-
Kilani
M,
Tradi
F, et al.
Transcatheter
arterial embolization with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx) for the treatment of hemorrhage due to uterine arteriovenous malformations.
Diagn
Interv
Imaging
. 2017;98(5):415-421.
BlueCross BlueShield Association (BCBSA). Technology Evaluation Center. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids [technology assessment].
Assessment Program 2002
; Volume 17, Tab 8.
Broder MS, Goodwin S, Chen G, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of myomectomy and uterine artery embolization.
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2002;100(5
pt
1):864-868.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. National Coverage Determination (NCD) for Therapeutic embolization (20.28). Original: 12/15/1978. Available at:
http://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details.aspx?NCDId=52&ncdver=1&CoverageSelection=Both&ArticleType=All&PolicyType=Final&s=Pennsylvania&KeyWord=embolization&KeyWordLookUp=Title&KeyWordSearchType=And&from2=search.asp&bc=gAAAABAAAAAAAA==&
. Accessed January 14, 2025.
ClinicalTrial.gov. The FIRSST: comparing
MRgFUS
(MR-guided focused ultrasound) versus UAE (uterine artery embolization). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00995878. First posted: October 15, 2009. Last updated January 12, 2018. Available at:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/
. Accessed January 14, 2025.
ClinicalTrial.gov. Uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus high-intensity-focused-ultrasound (HIFU) for treatment of uterine fibroids. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01834703. First Posted: April 18, 2013. Last Update Posted: August 30, 2019. Available at:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/
. Accessed January 14, 2025.
Dariushnia
SR, Nikolic B, Stokes LS, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic
leiomyomata
.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2014;25(11):1737-1747.
Das R,
Champaneria
R, Daniels JP, Belli AM. Comparison of embolic agents used in uterine artery
embolisation
: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cardiovasc
Intervent
Radiol
. 2014;37(5):1179-1190.
de
Bruijn
AM,
Ankum
WM,
Reekers
JA, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 10-year outcomes from the randomized EMMY trial.
Am J
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2016;215(6):745.e1-745.e12.
de
Bruijn
AM,
Smink
M,
Hehenkamp
WJK, et al. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic
adenomyosis
: 7-year clinical follow-up using UFS-
Qol
Questionnaire.
Cardiovasc
Intervent
Radiol
. 2017;40(9):1344-1350.
Domenico L Jr, Siskin GP. Uterine artery embolization and infertility.
Tech
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2006;9(1):7-11.
Doumouchtsis
SK,
Nikolopoulos
K,
Talaulikar
V, et al. Menstrual and fertility outcomes following the surgical management of postpartum
haemorrhage
: a systematic review.
BJOG
. 2014;121(4):382-388.
Edwards RD, Moss JG,
Lumsden
MA, et al. Committee of the Randomized Trial of Embolization versus Surgical Treatment for Fibroids. Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.
N
Engl
J Med
. 2007;356(4):360-370.
Ganguli
S,
Stecker
MS,
Pyne
D, et al. Uterine artery embolization in the treatment of postpartum uterine hemorrhage.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2011;22(2):169-176.
Goldberg J, Pereira L,
Berghella
V. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization.
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2002;100(5
pt
1):869-872.
Goldberg J, Pereira L,
Berghella
V, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for
fibromyomata
: uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy.
Am J
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2004;191(1):18-21.
Goodwin SC, Spies JB, Worthington-Kirsch R, et al. Uterine artery embolization for treatment of
leiomyomata
: long-term outcomes from the FIBROID Registry.
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2008;111(1):22-23.
Gupta JK, Sinha AS,
Lumsden
MA, Hickey M. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Cochrane Database of
Syst
Rev
. 2014;(12):CD005073.
Hald
K,
Klow
NE,
Qvigstad
E,
Istre
O. Laparoscopic occlusion compared with embolization of uterine vessels: a randomized controlled trial.
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2007;109(1):20-27.
Hald
K,
Langebrekke
A,
Klow
NE, et al. Laparoscopic occlusion of uterine vessels for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: initial experience and comparison to uterine artery embolization.
Am J
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2004;190(1):37-43.
Hald
K,
Noreng
HJ,
Istre
O,
Klow
NE. Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic occlusion of uterine arteries for
leiomyomas
: long-term results of a randomized comparative trial.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2009;20(10):1303-1310.
Hehenkamp
WJK,
Volkers
NA,
Donderwinkel
PFJ, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial):
peri
- and
postprocedural
results from a randomized controlled trial.
Am J
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2005;193(5):1618-1629.
Hirst
A, Dutton S, Wu O, et al. A multi-
centre
retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery
embolisation
for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The HOPEFUL study.
Health
Technol
Assess
. 2008;12(5):1-248, iii.
Holub
Z,
Eim
J,
Jabor
A, et al. Complications and
myoma
recurrence after laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion for symptomatic
myomas
.
J
Obstet
Gynaecol
Res
. 2006;32(1):55-62.
Homer H,
Saridogan
E. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage.
Fertil
Steril
. 2010;94(1):324-330.
Hu J, Tao X, Yin L, Shi Y. Successful conservative treatment of cervical pregnancy with uterine artery embolization followed by curettage: a report of 19 cases.
BJOG
. 2016;123
Suppl
3:97-102.
Jun F,
Yamin
L,
Xinli
X, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis of the literature.
Arch
Gynecol
Obstet
. 2012;285(5):1407-1413.
Kandinov
L, Bernstein PS. Uterine artery embolization for treatment of fibroids: effect on fertility and pregnancy outcomes. [Medscape Web site]. January 3, 2005. Available at:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/496253
[via subscription only]. Accessed January 14, 2025.
Kim MD, Kim S, Kim NK, et al. Long-term results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic
adenomyosis
.
AJR
Am J
Roentgenol
. 2007;188(1):176-181.
Kim TH, Lee HH, Kim JM, et al. Uterine artery embolization for primary postpartum hemorrhage.
Iran J
Reprod
Med
. 2013;11(6):511-518.
Kim T, Shin JH, Kim J, et al. Management of bleeding uterine arteriovenous malformation with bilateral uterine artery embolization.
Yonsei
Med J
. 2014;55(2):367-373.
Kirby JM,
Kachura
JR,
Rajan
DK, et al. Arterial embolization for primary postpartum hemorrhage.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2009;20(8):1036-1045.
Kitamura Y, Allison SJ,
Jha
RC, et al. MRI of
adenomyosis
: changes with uterine artery embolization.
AJR Am J
Roentgenol
. 2006;186(3):855-864.
Kwon JH, Kim GM, Han K, et al. Safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization in ectopic pregnancies refractory to systemic methotrexate treatment: a single-center study.
Cardiovasc
Intervent
Radiol
. 2017;40(9):1351-1357.
Liu WM. Laparoscopic bipolar coagulation of uterine vessels to treat symptomatic
leiomyomas
.
J Am
Assoc
Gynecol
Laparosc
. 2000;7(1):125-129.
Liu WM, Ng HT, Wu YC, et al. Laparoscopic bipolar coagulation of uterine vessels: a new method for treating symptomatic fibroids.
Fertil
Steril
. 2001;75(2):417-422.
Manyonda
IT,
Bratby
M, Horst JS, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on quality of life--results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) trial.
Cardiovasc
Intervent
Radiol
. 2012;35(3):530-536.
Mara M,
Maskova
J,
Fucikova
Z, et al. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy.
Cardiovasc
Intervent
Radiol
. 2008;31(1):73-85.
Marshburn
PB, Matthews ML, Hurst BS. Uterine artery embolization as a treatment option for uterine
myomas
.
Obstet
Gyncecol
Clin
North Am
. 2006;33(1):125-144.
Martin J,
Bhanot
K,
Athreya
S. Complications and
reinterventions
in uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a literature review and meta analysis.
Cardiovasc
Intervent
Radiol
. 2013; 36(2):395-402.
McLucas B, Reed RA. Repeat uterine artery embolization following poor results.
Minim Invasive
Ther
Allied Technol
. 2009;18(2):82-86.
McPherson K,
Manyonda
I,
Lumsden
MA, et al. A
randomised
trial of treating fibroids with either
embolisation
or myomectomy to measure the effect on quality of life among women wishing to avoid hysterectomy (the FEMME study): study protocol for a
randomised
controlled trial.
Trials
. 2014;15:468.
MeritMedical
. Uterine fibroid embolization treatment. [
MeritMedical
Web site]. Available at:
https://ask4ufe.com/what-is-ufe/ufe-treatment/#/ufe-treatment
.
Accessed January14, 2025.
Mohan PP, Hamblin MH,
Vogelzang
RL. Uterine artery embolization and its effect on fertility.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2013;24(7):925-930.
Moss JG, Cooper KG,
Khaund
A, et al.
Randomised
comparison of uterine artery
embolisation
(UAE) with surgical treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (REST trial): 5-year results.
BJOG
. 2011;118(8):936-944.
Novitas
Solutions, Inc. Local Coverage Article (LCA). A56682: Billing and coding: diagnostic abdominal aortography and renal angiography. [
Novitas
Solutions Web site]. Original: 07/11/2019. (Revised: 03/01/2024). Available at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleId=56682&ver=43
. Accessed January 14, 2025.
Novitas
Solutions, Inc. Local Coverage Determination (LCD). L35092: Diagnostic abdominal aortography and renal angiography. [
Novitas
Solutions Web site]. Original: 10/01/2015. (Revised: 11/07/2019). Available at:
https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/lcd.aspx?lcdid=35092&ver=78&keyword=uterine artery
embolization&keywordType
=
any&areaId
=s11,s38,s45&docType=NCA,CAL,NCD,MEDCAC,TA,MCD,6,3,5,1,F,P&contractOption=
name&contractorName
=6&sortBy=
relevance&bc
=1
. Accessed January 14, 2025.
Pisco
JM, Duarte M,
Bilhim
T, et al. Spontaneous pregnancy with a live birth after conventional and partial uterine fibroid embolization.
Radiology
. 2017;285(1):302-310.
Popovic
M,
Berzaczy
D,
Puchner
S, et al. Long-term quality of life assessment among patients undergoing uterine fibroid embolization.
AJR Am J
Roentgenol
. 2009;193(1):267-271.
Popovic
M,
Puchner
S,
Berzaczy
D, et al. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of
adenomyosis
: a review.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2011;22(7):901-909; quiz 909.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with the Society of Reproductive Surgeons.
Myomas
and reproductive function.
Fertil
Steril
. 2008;90(5
Suppl
):S125-S130.
Pron
G, Bennett J, Common A, et al. The Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. Part 2. Uterine fibroid reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization for fibroids.
Fertil
Steril
. 2003;79(1):120-127.
Rath
W,
Hackethal
A,
Bohlmann
MK. Second-line treatment of postpartum
haemorrhage
(PPH).
Arch
Gynecol
Obstet
. 2012; 286(3):549-561.
Razavi
MK,
Wolanske
KA, Hwang GL, et al. Angiographic classification of ovarian artery-to-uterine artery anastomoses: initial observations in uterine fibroid embolization.
Radiology
. 2002;224(3):707-712.
Ruuskanen
A,
Hippelainen
M,
Sipola
P,
Manninen
H. Uterine artery
embolisation
versus hysterectomy for
leiomyomas
: primary and 2-year follow-up results of a randomized prospective clinical trial.
Eur
Radiol
. 2010;20(10):2524-2532.
Sathe
NA,
Likis
FE, Young JL, et al. Procedures and uterine-sparing surgeries for managing postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review.
Obstet
Gynecol
Surv
. 2016;71(2):99-113.
Shlansky
-Goldberg RD, Rosen MA,
Mondschein
JI, et al. Comparison of polyvinyl alcohol microspheres and
tris
-acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine fibroid embolization: results of a single-center randomized study.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2014;25(6):823-832.
Society of Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists
of Canada (SOGC). SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Uterine fibroid embolization (UFE). Number 150, October 2004.
Int
J
Gynaecol
Obstet
. 2005;89(3):305-318.
Spies JB, Spector A, Roth AR, et al. Complications after uterine artery embolization for
leiomyomas
.
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2002;100(5
pt
1):873-880.
Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids (
leiomyomas
): treatment overview. [
UpToDate
Web site]. 08/26/2024. Available at:
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/uterine-fibroids-leiomyomas-treatment-overview?search=Uterine fibroids (
leiomyomas
): treatment
overview&source
=
search_result&selectedTitle
=1~150&usage_type=
default&display_rank
=1
. [via subscription only]. Accessed January 14, 2025.
Stokes LS, Wallace MJ, Godwin RB, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic
leiomyomas
.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2010;21(8):1153-1163.
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Contour® Emboli PVA and
FasTracker
®-325 Infusion Catheter. Summary of safety and effectiveness. [FDA web site.] 09/23/03. Available at:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf3/K030966.pdf
. Accessed January 14, 2025.
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
Embosphere
® Microspheres for use in uterine fibroid embolization. 510(k) summary. [FDA Web site]. 11/22/02. Available at:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf2/k021397.pdf
. Accessed January 14, 2025.
van der
Kooij
SM,
Bipat
S,
Hehenkamp
WJK, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus surgery in the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: a systematic review and
metaanalysis
.
Am J
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2011;205(4):317.e1-e18.
van der
Kooij
SM,
Hehenkamp
WJK,
Volkers
NA, et al. Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial.
Am J
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2010;203(2):105.e1-e13.
van der
Kooij
SM,
Hehenkamp
WJK. Uterine fibroids (
leiomyomas
): treatment with uterine artery embolization. [
UpToDate
Web site]. 12/04/2024. Available at:
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/uterine-fibroids-leiomyomas-treatment-with-uterine-artery-embolization?search=Uterine fibroids (
leiomyomas
): treatment with uterine artery
embolization&source
=
search_result&selectedTitle
=1~150&usage_type=
default&display_rank
=1
[via subscription only]. Accessed January 14, 2025.
Vilos
GA,
Allaire
C,
Laberge
PY, Leyland N. The management of uterine
leiomyomas
.
J
Obstet
Gynaecol
Can
. 2015;37(2):157-178.
Volkers
NA,
Hehenkamp
WJK,
Birnie
E, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 2 years' outcome from
th
e randomized EMMY trial.
Am J
Obstet
Gynecol
. 2007;196(6):519.e1-e11.
Walker WJ, Barton-Smith P. Long-term follow up of uterine artery
embolisation
: an effective alternative in the treatment of fibroids.
BJOG
. 2006;113(4):464-468.
Walker WJ, Pelage JP. Uterine artery
embolisation
for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up.
BJOG
. 2002;109(11):1262-1272.
Wang S,
Meng
X, Dong Y. The evaluation of uterine artery embolization as a nonsurgical treatment option for
adenomyosis
.
Int
J
Gynaecol
Obstet
. 2016;133(2):202-205.
Xiaolin
Z, Ling L,
Chengxin
Y, et al.
Transcatheter
intraarterial
methotrexate infusion combined with selective uterine artery embolization as a treatment option for cervical pregnancy.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2010;21(6):836-841.
Yoon DJ, Jones M,
Taani
JA, et al. A systematic review of acquired uterine arteriovenous malformations: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and
transcatheter
treatment.
AJP Rep
. 2016;6(1):e6-e14.
Yousefi
S,
Czeyda-Pommersheim
F, White AM, et al. Repeat uterine artery embolization: indications and technical findings.
J
Vasc
Interv
Radiol
. 2006;17(12):1923-1929.
Zhou J, He L, Liu P, et al. Outcomes in
adenomyosis
treated with uterine artery embolization are associated with lesion vascularity: a long-term follow-up study of 252 cases.
PLoS
One
. 2016;11(11):e0165610.
Coding
CPT Procedure Code Number(s)
MPCPTCodesPub
36245, 36246, 36247, 36248, 37243
ICD - 10 Procedure Code Number(s)
MPICD10ProcCodesNarrativesPub
N/A
ICD - 10 Diagnosis Code Number(s)
MPICD10DiagCodesNarrativesPub
D25.0 Submucous leiomyoma of uterus
D25.1 Intramural leiomyoma of uterus
D25.2 Subserosal leiomyoma of uterus
D25.9 Leiomyoma of uterus, unspecified
O72.0 Third-stage hemorrhage
O72.1 Other immediate postpartum hemorrhage
O72.2 Delayed and secondary postpartum hemorrhage
HCPCS Level II Code Number(s)
MPHCPCSCodesNarrativesPub
N/A
Revenue Code Number(s)
MPRevenueCodesNarrativesPub
N/A
MPMiscCodesNarrativesPub
MPCodeNarrativePub
Coding and Billing Requirements
MPCodingAndBillingPub
Cross Reference
<div class="ExternalClassDED07FE991CE40DFA4E32EFF44E00F7A">07.10.05,11.06.05,11.06.10,12.01.01</div>
Policy History
MPPolicyHistoryPub
Revisions From 11.06.04k:
03/05/
2025
The policy has been reviewed and reissued to communicate the Company's continuing
position on uterine artery embolization.
03/20/2024
The policy has been reviewed and reissued to communicate the Company's continuing
position on Uterine Artery Embolization.
06/28/2023
The policy has been reviewed and reissued to communicate the Company's continuing
position on Uterine Artery Embolization.
06/29/2022
The policy has been reviewed and reissued to communicate the Company's continuing
position on Uterine Artery Embolization.
06/02/2021
The policy has been reviewed and reissued to communicate the Company's continuing position on Uterine Artery Embolization.
04/08/2020
This policy has been reissued in accordance with the Company's annual review process.
05/20/2019
This version of the policy will become effective 05/20/2019. The intent of this policy remains unchanged, but the policy has been updated to provide additional clinical research information.
Revisions From 11.06.04j:
04/11/2018
This policy has undergone routine review, and no revisions have been made.
Effective 10/05/2017 this policy has been updated to the new policy template format.
Version Effective Date:
5/20/2019
Version Issued Date:
5/20/2019
Version Reissued Date:
3/5/2025
11.06.04
Medical Policy Bulletin
Commercial
MPattachmentdataPub
No
Decline
Accept and go to Medical Policies
|
Decline